On Tuesday, May 11, US President Joe Biden called Ferdinand Marcos Jr., saying “that he looks forward to working with the President-elect to continue strengthening the U.S.-Philippine Alliance,” according to a White House press release. On the same day, Secretary of State Antony Blinken tweeted congratulating Marcos on his apparent victory and to the people of the Philippines for a “successful election.” ICHRP-US presents eight points in response to the Biden Administration remarks:
1. The US is already calling Marcos the winner, despite the fact the election remains in question due to mass reports of cheating and fraud. The congratulatory messages are not only premature but inappropriate and dismissive of widespread concerns about irregularities and voter disenfranchisement.
2. The US response to Marcos spits in the face of the many victims of the Marcos and Duterte regimes. Rather than acknowledge the impacts of such an election on the many who have suffered human rights abuses in the Philippines, Biden and Secretary Blinken have chosen to promote political convenience.
3. The first calls to Marcos came from the US and China. The US is trying to position itself to maintain military and economic influence in the Philippines over China. This is another instance instance in which foreign powers place the Philippines in the crosshairs of the new cold war.
4. Marcos is being held to contempt of court in the United States. Once again, the United States is overlooking legality and justice for human rights violations for the sake of military and economic positioning in the Asia Pacific region. While Marcos may seek immunity as a sitting head of state, his case from 1992 should not be ignored or dismissed. People in the United States must uphold this issue and demand accountability.
5. The Biden Administration’s response to this election aligns with its previous responses to the Duterte regime. While Biden has feigned to care for human rights and democracy, he has continued unabashed military support for the dictator duterte, and shows no genuine action against the well recorded human rights atrocities in the Philippines.
6. While the US state department created a report on the Philippines with damning evidence of the crimes of Duterte, the US congratulations to Marcos shows the Biden Administration is cowering to the protests of the Philippine government that decried said State Department report.
7. The United States has historically used the presence of small and isolated terrorist groups (Abu Sayeff and ISIS) in the Philippines to justify US military presence and aid, despite the fact that terrorsim in the Philippines has at its worst been enacted by the Armed Forces of the Philippines, for which the US is responsible for training.
8. At this time, given the unfavorable response of the Biden Administration, we must rely on building a grassroots movement of support for the call to stop US military AID to the Philippines. We must educate and mobilize our communities and allies to pressure progressive legislators to decisively oppose US support of the Marcos-Duterte tandem.